This title sounds amazing right? You want to learn more and are engaged. I am not prepared to , nor available for the time it would take to give an answer that would encompass a crumb of this whole strawberry topped New York cheezcake with graham cracker crust. Food is like a super hero, if we knew Why it is so amazing it probably would seem less exciting. Science has a problem with this: Always wanting to know why.
"Just because" works as a way to see past the why? to the whoa!. The appreciation for what it is simply because it's doing what it's gotta do.
I will focus on, in actuality, the power structure behind foods as a social artifact. Being in an anthropology class, one must never fail to give at least a gulp's worth of critique to power struggles. Obviously, it is a recurring theme, as we saw in the film Tampopo (rent it) and learning about obento box lunches (try it). As my own cinematic life of anthropological importance plays out, I can't help but notice how my role as a female, in my class bracket, with my symbols, values, and culture, interacts with everyone else's stats. In particular, has my role as a woman impacted the places in which I revolve myself around food? Does my relationship with food exist in the presence of a man or concerning "domestic" duties? I would say that, yes, these are descriptions of what my interaction has become. But to contradict such broad statements, I am also a very creative and daring chef. I end up cooking for my boyfriend because, damn it, I want it the way I want it and that way is the bomb. He's never yet complained.
No problems there.
But then why do I feel like I'm being "domestic" when I cook food for my Manfriend and I. Or when I'm packing lunches for the kids that I nanny for. How is the way that I am treating this responsibilité de nourriture different than how a man would do it? Are there innate characteristics or is it an example of either you got it or you don't..
Here is where everyone chimes in "Well my dad would make great..." "He makes the best..." Most of these fill in the blanks usually end in meat. Steak. Burgers. In my case, spaghetti, but that's because I'm Italian. You can't get far being an Italian and not being able to make good spaghetti, no matter which sex. But do women have some sort of maternal way of caring for the health and survival of the species, while the men are the big strong protectors? Does this resort back to hunter/gatherer instincts? There are probably tests, surveys, and student groups getting to the bottom of this. But what I am wondering is if this is the patriarchial power structure at play, like with Tampopo's challenge at becoming one of the first female noodle chef, or are women just built with a greener thumb, a natural gift for getting the most out of food?
I would like to balance the role's of the sexes, as well as even out modes of production for all social human interaction by creating atmosphere's of respect. Cultural division of labor is acceptable as long as it doesn't impose harmful constraints on an individual. Although it was rare in Tampopo's Japan for a woman to be a noodle chef, she was still able to do so. Also, if a man wants to cook, be a nanny, or take on more feminine roles of care-giving no one should be stopping him.
Social and cultural divisions of the sexes have deep historical roots. Some of these roots need to be pulled, those which discourage self exploration and diversity. While others should be nourished; each day as a nanny and care-giver and girlfriend I become more aware of the woman inside of me, the creator and nurturer of life. Perhaps it could be challenged that men could learn a thing or two from indulging in their womanly halves, blurring and challenging the socially constructed boundaries of masculinity and femininity in relation to food.